|
|
Post by Inspeqtor on Jun 10, 2022 12:09:11 GMT
Canon 90D Sigma 150-600C at 600mm with Sigma 2.0 Teleconverter  |
|
|
|
Post by Inspeqtor on Aug 19, 2022 21:25:16 GMT
 Moon 08-19-2022 by inspeqtor, on Flickr Canon 90D Sigma 150-600C at 600mm with Sigma 2.0 Teleconverter equals 1200mm focal length Click on the filename BELOW the photo (Moon 08-19-2022) then click on the picture at Flickr then scroll around on the image to see it full scale. |
|
|
|
Post by hmca on Aug 19, 2022 22:41:00 GMT
It looks like you've gotten very nice contrast and detail, Charles. Hoping you are happy with this one. Know I would be.
Assuming you set your camera back to the RAW setting. What did you use following RAW?
|
|
|
|
Post by Inspeqtor on Aug 20, 2022 3:48:14 GMT
It looks like you've gotten very nice contrast and detail, Charles. Hoping you are happy with this one. Know I would be. Assuming you set your camera back to the RAW setting. What did you use following RAW? Thank you for your very kind words Helen!! Yes I am very happy with this one. Yes I did set my camera back to Raw just fine. I hope you will not be upset with me, but this photo is SOOC (straight out of camera) - I did not do any extra work on this photo other than cropping it square and adding the date. |
|
pontiac1940
CE Members
Posts: 6,356
Open to constructive criticism of photos: Yes
|
Post by pontiac1940 on Aug 20, 2022 15:47:48 GMT
Charles, your moon photos always impress. So sharp.
Very nice.
Clive
|
|
|
|
Post by hmca on Aug 20, 2022 17:29:18 GMT
this photo is SOOC (straight out of camera) - I did not do any extra work on this photo other than cropping it square and adding the date. Only makes it more impressive, Charles. |
|
|
|
Post by kdcintx on Aug 20, 2022 20:14:26 GMT
Excellent photos. No post-processing needed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Inspeqtor on Aug 20, 2022 21:47:16 GMT
Charles, your moon photos always impress. So sharp. Very nice. Clive Thank you for your very kind words Clive! |
|
|
|
Post by Inspeqtor on Aug 20, 2022 21:47:41 GMT
this photo is SOOC (straight out of camera) - I did not do any extra work on this photo other than cropping it square and adding the date. Only makes it more impressive, Charles. Thank you Helen! |
|
|
|
Post by Inspeqtor on Aug 20, 2022 21:48:18 GMT
Excellent photos. No post-processing needed. Thank you kd! |
|
|
|
Post by Inspeqtor on Sept 8, 2022 18:35:43 GMT
I took a couple more shots last night of the Moon. I used my Canon 90D with my Sigma 150-600 Lens and my Sigma 2.0 Tele-Extender When ever I use my tele-extender to double my focal length to 1200mm that cuts the amount of light coming thru the lens thus my 150-600 f6.5 lens changes to f13 1/500 second - f13 with ISO 2000  I had been thinking for a few days for the next moon shot I do I would do something different. I remembered something I have seen other people do in the past but I had never thought of doing this. I have a second older 2.0 extender made by Kenko. I added that to my setup now making my lens 2400mm!!!! Now my settings are this: 1/500 second - f25 with ISO 4000  I did do some post work on these photos in PSE2021 with my Raw photos |
|
|
|
Post by Inspeqtor on Sept 9, 2022 1:38:33 GMT
I am curious if anyone thinks I over worked the photos, or did I just do "OK"?
|
|
pontiac1940
CE Members
Posts: 6,356
Open to constructive criticism of photos: Yes
|
Post by pontiac1940 on Sept 9, 2022 2:21:24 GMT
I am curious if anyone thinks I over worked the photos, or did I just do "OK"? Absolutely not. Your moon shots are excellent.  Charles. Just curious why you would use f25 ... unless it is a function of the two extenders. Hummm ... f8 with one extender would become f16 (?) and a second would push the effective aperture higher. A lower aperture and lower ISO might help, but I think your moon photos are very good as is. |
|
|
|
Post by Inspeqtor on Sept 9, 2022 13:52:45 GMT
I am curious if anyone thinks I over worked the photos, or did I just do "OK"? Absolutely not. Your moon shots are excellent. Hummm ... f8 with one extender would become f16 (?) and a second would push the effective aperture higher. Charles. Just curious why you would use f25 ... unless it is a function of the two extenders. A lower aperture and lower ISO might help, but I think your moon photos are very good as is. Thank you Pontiac for your very kind words on my Post work which is very very limited as I have almost zero experience on doing that. With a 2.0 Extender yes a lens at f8 does become f16 with one extended to the camera body and lens. With two 2.0 extenders then the f value does become f32 On my lens at 600mm my f/stop is f6.3, with one 2.0 extender now at 1200mm then it becomes f13 with two 2.0 extenders at 2400mm now it becomes f25. I cannot change that having two extenders mounted. There is also a 1.4 extender which I bought, but now I wish I never did, but with my lens at 150mm (no extender) my f/stop is f5.0. At 600mm my f/stop is f6.3 When I install the 1.4 extender now at 150mm (now 210mm) my f/stop is f7.1 and at 600mm (now 840mm) my f/stop with the 1.4 is f9.0 |
|
|
|
Post by cats4jan on Sept 9, 2022 23:28:51 GMT
Those are amazing moon shots
|
|
