pontiac1940
CE Members
Posts: 6,356
Open to constructive criticism of photos: Yes
|
Post by pontiac1940 on Nov 2, 2022 15:55:02 GMT
|
|
|
Post by BuckSkin on Nov 2, 2022 18:16:36 GMT
some photos taken at ISO 2,000
Great photos regardless.
As for the ISO, I would be tickled in many of my photos were as low as ISO 2000; in a days shooting, I will have many at ISO 16K and above; without looking, I believe my 7DMkII is capable of something like ISO 256,000.
The way the majority of people view photos these days, I don't think high ISO is such a factor as it used to be.
|
|
|
Post by Lillias on Nov 2, 2022 18:20:58 GMT
On a tip, I motored to Waterton Lakes National Park on Saturday, October 29. I toughed out the cold and howling wind and by late day was rewarded by a huge herd of elk that came quite close to my car. These are fabulous photos Clive. It must have been lovely to see these animals in real life like this.
|
|
|
Post by BuckSkin on Nov 2, 2022 18:36:08 GMT
This is a long complicated story
Well....., bring it on; we like long complicated stories --- the longer and more complicated the better.
|
|
pontiac1940
CE Members
Posts: 6,356
Open to constructive criticism of photos: Yes
|
Post by pontiac1940 on Nov 2, 2022 18:44:07 GMT
The way the majority of people view photos these days, I don't think high ISO is such a factor as it used to be. Very true. I tend to be a but fussy and have "liked" Facebook posts with photos that look okay. Then I look on my computer at the posts the images are horrid glop. I use a Samsung 10-inch tablet for reading news at night. I sometimes look at my own post images on it. Provided I am not on Facebook (that tortures images sometimes), the images are so sharp and crisp on that screen.
|
|
pontiac1940
CE Members
Posts: 6,356
Open to constructive criticism of photos: Yes
|
Post by pontiac1940 on Nov 2, 2022 18:47:23 GMT
These are fabulous photos Clive. It must have been lovely to see these animals in real life like this. Thanks Lillias. I am grateful for the opportunity. A freind tagged me in her FB post the day before...she had posted a video of the her coming out late in the day. I am pleased I took her hint. It was very neat. I've been to the elk rutting area many times and they are usually far far away. It is a large, grassy alluvial plain with trees around half of it. They spend a lot of time in the trees.
|
|
pontiac1940
CE Members
Posts: 6,356
Open to constructive criticism of photos: Yes
|
Post by pontiac1940 on Nov 2, 2022 18:52:37 GMT
Well....., bring it on; we like long complicated stories --- the longer and more complicated the better. Okay ... here is an edited version of my Facebook post last night. Where to start—and end? Last Friday, ____ , who lives near Waterton Lakes NP, tagged me in a post about the elk she photographed that day. Thanks ___. ☺
So, on Saturday, October 29, I drove to Waterton. When I arrived, there were a lot of elk at the usual rutting-area location—but they were quite far away. Over close to 4 hours they drifted closer and then farther back to the trees—I even left two times but fortunately, they came back. By 4:30 PM, there were no other people along the viewing road and the elk seemed to lose their caution and moved out and eventually came quite close to the viewing road—where I was sitting in the Nissan Rogue. When I left the main viewing area at 5:45 PM, a separate herd was close to another nearby road. I went there and took more photos.
There were 400 and 500 elk in the general area—perhaps more. In the panorama photo there are close to 200 elk and this was just a small part of the overall herd(s).
NOTE: For you photography geeks, I need to explain the light (or lack of light) because it changed all afternoon and was never constant. For a short while around 2:30, there was short-lived, patchy sunlight and then diffuse light. But most of the time it was cloudy and got duller as the day progressed. When I left, the camera was set at ISO 2,000. White balance was all over the map.
Could not decide to post a lot of photos (that I done) or just a few. You know where the back button is. 😉I just wanted to share what a wonderful experience this was—despite the light. (And miserable howling, cold wind. But well worth it.) Short comments with a few of these photos. You’ll catch on—there were a lot of elk.
Photos are in random order. No logic here...
|
|
|
Post by hmca on Nov 3, 2022 0:18:26 GMT
So glad you were rewarded with such a great opportunity to photograph the elk, Clive. I checked your EXIF......see that you used that super zoom... Good for you waiting them out and in those weather conditions. Great photos....were they howling....or whatever noise elks make?
|
|
pontiac1940
CE Members
Posts: 6,356
Open to constructive criticism of photos: Yes
|
Post by pontiac1940 on Nov 3, 2022 1:34:16 GMT
were they howling....or whatever noise elks make? Thanks Helen. Yes, the bulls bugle. It is very cool. I took some video on Saturday and learned something about the cows. I knew they don't bugle but they bleat...something I never knew. As they were leaving the staging area for the night they walked by me (perhaps 200 feet or more away) and were bleating. Very cool. This short video shows bull elk bugling... you can hear the high-pitch bugle quite well. This 40-second video shows some of the herd last Saturday. Sorry for the wind noise. (Was chilly.) I do not know how to mute only portions of a video in Elements Premiere. Be sure to have the sound up in the last half. The videos are in DropBox. Let me know if there are problems.
|
|
|
Post by hmca on Nov 3, 2022 2:04:13 GMT
Love seeing the videos! So glad I asked! No problems.
|
|
|
Post by BuckSkin on Nov 3, 2022 2:59:26 GMT
I am far from having any idea about making video; that being said, it is my understanding that those big woolly things you see on microphones are to eliminate the wind noise; then, I could be wrong.
|
|
pontiac1940
CE Members
Posts: 6,356
Open to constructive criticism of photos: Yes
|
Post by pontiac1940 on Nov 3, 2022 13:58:50 GMT
those big woolly things you see on microphones are to eliminate the wind noise; Yes. Think we'd need to attach a mic via a cord to the camera. Sony is now selling a small camera specifically for "vlogging" and it has a wind baffle attached.
|
|
pontiac1940
CE Members
Posts: 6,356
Open to constructive criticism of photos: Yes
|
Post by pontiac1940 on Nov 3, 2022 14:07:58 GMT
he way the majority of people view photos these days, I don't think high ISO is such a factor as it used to be. Yes. I recall my first digital camera that produced noisy photos at ISOs below 1,000. APS-C sensors were much better and then there was a huge leap in high-ISO quality when cameras jumped to full-frame sensors.
|
|
|
Post by jackscrap on Nov 3, 2022 20:27:32 GMT
Wonderful photos Clive, thanks for providing a bit of the backstory, your patience was rewarded with these majestic animals coming within a decent range for shooting.
|
|