|
Post by BuckSkin on Jun 13, 2015 15:13:47 GMT
This picture was taken in June 2004 with a $29.95 K-Mart 35mm film camera whose only adjustment was the direction it was pointed.
At that time, the only thing we knew about photography was that a camera was required and we barely met that requirement.
BEFORE:
We took hundreds of pictures on that trip and mailed the film cartridges to York Studios in West Virginia where we splurged and had them made into 5x7s; little did we know that 4x6 would have been a much better choice for the 2:3 image ratio, as half-an-inch of detail is lost from the long side when printing at 5x7.
In the last few weeks, I have used our old $29.95 HP 2200 "All in One" printer/scanner in a massive effort to digitize a lifetimes worth of printed photographs. (I haven't even made a dent in the pile. After I wade through getting all these prints scanned, a windfall of unexpected cash will allow the purchase of a much better scanner and I will get to do it all over again. A poor man has to do things more than once.)
In squaring up and trimming these scans from the York prints, I have found York's cutter to have been out-of-square by a hair over 1/8" across the width of every last one of these 5x7s, thus causing me to lose another 1/4" of image detail.
Also, in every print, I have found a "groove", or impression, about a third up from the bottom, that runs the entire length of the print; I cannot see this groove when looking at the actual prints, but it stands out like a red flag when viewing the scans (and NO, it is not a defect on the scanner bed, as the groove remains constant, regardless of print position/orientation on the scanner bed).
I do not know whether this groove was caused by some defect in our professional grade camera, dragging along the film; or, more likely, it was caused by some defect in the automated development process at York; or, it could be a defect in the paper used; whichever is to blame, we have hundreds of images marred by it.
I do not know what caused the primer-red fog on the right edge of the image, but it is actually part of the print and not something that got sprayed on it afterwards; I have seen this same primer-red spot in a few more of these prints.
AFTER:
The sky was captured 28-September-2014 at my father-in-laws farm; I had never before witnessed such a dramatic and varied display of cloud formations as were visible for about three days that weekend; every cloud type we learned about in grade school was on display at the same time and it did not rain for several days prior nor afterwards.
I think I did pretty good, considering what I had to work with.
Thanks for looking.
|
|
dicklaxt
Established Forum Member
Posts: 397
Open to constructive criticism of photos: Yes
|
Post by dicklaxt on Jun 13, 2015 15:42:41 GMT
You sure did Bucko,I wouldn't know where to start.
dick
|
|
|
Post by hmca on Jun 13, 2015 15:43:48 GMT
Buckskin, you have been able to bring out a lot of detail and color. I am sure these pictures must bring back many good memories. I can't offer any technical advice just appreciation for your efforts.
|
|
|
Post by BuckSkin on Jun 13, 2015 17:16:10 GMT
Buckskin, you have been able to bring out a lot of detail and color. I am sure these pictures must bring back many good memories. I can't offer any technical advice just appreciation for your efforts. Thanks for the kind words.
As poor quality as they are, compared to what we are now capable of (and we are still a long way from knowing what we are doing), those pictures document a (thus far) once in a lifetime trip.
For common people, one big disadvantage of film photography was the fact that we could not see the results until weeks after the picture was taken, and thus make on the spot adjustments if necessary (not that that particular camera allowed for any adjustment whatsoever).
These days, we can poke the memory-card in the laptop before leaving the scene, and actually see if there is some situation that needs addressing, and maybe even retake the pictures until we get it right; and, we can take THOUSANDS at no cost whatsoever.
Another issue I have noticed in about 50% of those pictures is a definite softness to the left side of the images; the detail is much better at extreme right and gradually softens toward the left, most likely due to something not quite right about the camera; it is not apparent in every picture.
I wish that we had invested in a much nicer camera for that trip, but it took every dime we had saved for years to make the trip; if we had waited a couple years, we could not have gone, as fuel was right around a buck per gallon when we went and jumped to nearly five bucks soon thereafter --- Hurricane Katrina was the turning point in our economy and when everything skyrocketed in price, never to come back down.
Thanks for reading.
|
|
|
Post by BuckSkin on Jun 13, 2015 21:57:12 GMT
Here is another before and after; desert picture is another scan from the same trip as above; replacement sky from same place/day as the previous one.
BEFORE:
AFTER:
Thanks for looking.
|
|
qBall
New Forum Member
Posts: 8
Open to constructive criticism of photos: Yes
|
Post by qBall on Jun 13, 2015 23:56:54 GMT
Hi buckskin. Good luck with scanning and restoring your prints. It can be a very painstaking job, but well worth it and rewarding in the long run If you would like some advice on how you might be able to improve the photos even more using pse (richer landscape colors, correct exposure, better match sky to horizon and foreground etc) then please post back and I'll be happy to post some pointers and example photo. But in a couple of hours I'll be gone for a week before I can come back, so post back asap if interested. Cheers
|
|
|
Post by Sepiana on Jun 14, 2015 0:04:56 GMT
Hi buckskin. Good luck with scanning and restoring your prints. It can be a very painstaking job, but well worth it and rewarding in the long run If you would like some advice on how you might be able to improve the photos even more using pse (richer landscape colors, correct exposure, better match sky to horizon and foreground etc) then please post back and I'll be happy to post some pointers and example photo. But in a couple of hours I'll be gone for a week before I can come back, so post back asap if interested. Cheers Hi qball, welcome to PSE&M! Glad to have you join us.
It is very kind of you offer to help BuckSkin with his photos. As you are new to this forum, I thought you may want to check our new updated forum rules concerning feedback on a member's photo, editing, etc.
photoshopelementsandmore.com/thread/544/forum-updates-read
|
|
qBall
New Forum Member
Posts: 8
Open to constructive criticism of photos: Yes
|
Post by qBall on Jun 14, 2015 0:32:05 GMT
Hi Sepiana, thank you for the welcome and yes I did read the rules before posting but I didn't think offering to help was against the rules.
I just wanted to tell the op that his photos can still be further improved. Í don't have time to post pointers, tutorials etc if no-one actually asks because if I do, then it's possible no-one actually reads them and so it would be just a waste of time for me. In these types of threads it's very likely that other viewers apart from the op might be interested in learning new tips/techniques but since it's the op's photo, it's his call whether anyone can post tips/pointers on how to improve it even more.
I have to go in about 90 minutes so the op probably won't post back anyhow before then.
|
|