|
Post by BuckSkin on Aug 13, 2021 16:55:15 GMT
Note >> I have since fixed this photo so you can click it for a larger view. Note > Keep an eye on this thread, as I intend to add more photos as I get them ready. Cincinnati, New Orleans, and Texas Pacific - Mile 126.6 Combined Weight = 1,664,000 pounds Combined Horsepower = 17,800 hp Take note of the combined weight and consider that, just a few miles ahead, is the very high, very long, South Fork Trestle that was constructed in the mid-1800s. South Fork Trestle is long enough for all four locomotives and half the cars in this train, each one weighing over a quarter-million pounds. Considering the horsepower, the railroad has the huge advantage of adding unlimited power, all controlled by the lead engine/operator, even if that added power is mid-train or at the very end; if the load or terrain requires, just add more locomotives. Those four locomotives can probably launch that train and achieve 60-MPH quicker than the car you are driving. The reason for mid-train "helpers" and end of train "pushers" is to lessen strain on coupler knuckles and to boost brake air pressure and to quicken the drop in pressure when the brakes are applied. The strain of the entire train is on the frame and coupler of the very first car. This is my first effort at damage control as per this post: photoshopelementsandmore.com/thread/8063/unintentional-camera-adjustment-dilemmaSame location, eight weeks earlier, looking in the same direction - North: photoshopelementsandmore.com/post/85473/threadSame location, eight weeks earlier, looking in the opposite direction - South: photoshopelementsandmore.com/post/85474/thread
|
|
|
Post by hmca on Aug 13, 2021 19:20:21 GMT
Thanks for sharing your image, Buckskin. Looks like you did pretty good with the noise reduction. Are you pleased with your results?
Thanks also for all the info on the train....I had to Google South Fork Trestle to see what it looked like. Quite impressive.
|
|
|
Post by kdcintx on Aug 13, 2021 19:56:19 GMT
Thanks for the train lesson about the "helpers" and "pushers." Very interesting.
|
|
|
Post by BuckSkin on Aug 14, 2021 4:23:21 GMT
Looks like you did pretty good with the noise reduction. Are you pleased with your results? Thanks for the complement; yes, I am well pleased considering what the originals looked like. I made two copies in DxO, one using my normal "recipe" except with the noise sliders maxed out, the other with the noise sliders maxed out as well plus no contrast of any sort. I used the "normal recipe" as the base/background and about 20% opacity layer of the second version stacked on top of that. I made a stamp-visible layer, used the split channels feature in Elements + to split the RGB into individual grey-scale layers, then applied maxed out noise reduction to the Blue channel. I merged my channels back together as another layer. Stamp visible again. At this point, the sky and the larger areas of the locomotives still did not look to suit me; so, I applied NIK "Sky Noise" and then applied it again. I had originally intended to limit the Sky Noise to the sky and larger locomotive surfaces only; but, after close examination, I let it cover the entire image. Stamp visible again, then I did the blur/average levels trick to get rid of the heavy green cast. To this, I applied NIK Color Effects Pro Pro Contrast with regular contrast at 50% and dynamic at 100% and bumped the opacity of this back to about 80. To bring the life back into the image, I applied Elements + Edge Mask sharpening at maximum 500. Pixel-peeping purists may find a million flaws but it suits me and I am happy.
|
|
|
Post by hmca on Aug 14, 2021 11:51:32 GMT
That's quite a process, Buckskin. I would never think to do all of those things....glad it worked for you.
|
|
|
Post by BuckSkin on Aug 15, 2021 8:58:35 GMT
Here is a bit more train/railroad knowledge: See the signpost with a "W" ? That means blow the whistle for a crossing, which is not actually correct, as trains have not had whistles for the last sixty years; they have horns, huge air horns with huge air lines. Also, they have politically corrected up the sign for the knowledge-challenged members of the staff; a real genuine blow-for-the-crossing sign does not have a "W"; it has three black bars and a dot stacked atop each other; two bars, a dot, and another bar. Listen the next time you hear a train approaching a crossing; you will distinctly hear two long blasts, a short blast, and another long, usually quite long and lingering blast. This is what the real deal looks like; it is properly called a whistleboard: There are also other patterns of blasts with other meanings.
|
|
|
Post by hmca on Aug 15, 2021 16:24:09 GMT
I'm going to have to pay more attention to the signs at crossings......interesting, BuckSkin.
|
|
pontiac1940
CE Members
Posts: 6,360
Open to constructive criticism of photos: Yes
|
Post by pontiac1940 on Aug 15, 2021 16:32:25 GMT
signpost with a "W" ? That means blow the whistle for a crossing, Neat information. Like Helen, I think you did a good job of recovering the photos taken with the wrong settings. Clive
|
|
|
Post by BuckSkin on Sept 21, 2021 21:59:54 GMT
I have fixed the initial image in the first post, making it larger and "clickable" to see the full size.
Please click the image and have a closer look.
|
|