Madame
Established Forum Member
Posts: 504
Open to constructive criticism of photos: Yes
|
Post by Madame on May 30, 2015 23:35:23 GMT
I think it's polite to ask before one edit someone else's picture. Constructive criticism is welcome for my part. CC is something to learn from.. what is good what can be better.
I don't think that "Anyone can make a copy" is a valid argument in this group. We have ethical guidelines.. such as copyright (and some other words i don't remember).
BTW.. I was wondering about this statement by bokeh
What did you mean?
|
|
|
Post by Tpgettys on May 31, 2015 0:21:53 GMT
For now, the way *I* look at it, the purpose of sharing an image in Show Your Work is to solicit creative criticism and engage is a discussion about the fine points of design, framing, etc. If that isn't what is wanted, images should be shared in the user's gallery, not here. bokeh offering his creative criticism and post-processing-by-example strikes me as very much in the spirit of Show Your Work. These are difficult things to navigate, as feelings can easily be hurt if criticism is not carefully worded, but it can also be enormously helpful if done in a respectful and professional way. I hope we can find ways to do this so everyone feels safe and respected. Personally I feel that unless a critique is requested then people should steer clear of it. I once had the temerity in the early days of the PET forum (pre Elements Village) to point out a glaring spelling mistake on a scrapbook page that someone posted and the OP was very upset & came back at me quite vehemently, so since then I have never felt happy criticising someone's work. I have already had one person criticise & post an altered version one of my images in Photo Theme which is supposed to be a fun thread (although I noticed that he is now a deleted member (self deleted or otherwise?) This is not a forum aimed at professional photographers, there are plenty of forums out there for people who want to have their work critiqued and who are quite willing to give their opinions. I think if there is too much criticism then members may be put off from sharing their work. Just my two pennyworth. Bayla Hi Bayla, I certainly appreciate you weighting in on this important discussion. My sense of it is that a post in the Show Your Work board is a request for a discussion of the technical aspects of a work; If a person simply wishes to share their work with this community it should be done in their gallery. They will show up in the New Posts list, and laudatory comments can be given there, just as they are here. However, please understand that is just my opinion; I know it is not shared by everyone, including some of the staff of this forum. Part of the problem as I see it is that we have not made clear what the purpose of the Show Your Work board is, and the name itself is pretty ambiguous. Our fervent wish is to open up this forum so everyone feels more safe to share and say what they wish, and that it will be respected. Being clear about the guidelines will foster that, making it clear what to expect in the various areas of the forum.
|
|
WayneS
Established Forum Member
Posts: 476
Open to constructive criticism of photos: Yes
|
Post by WayneS on May 31, 2015 1:46:44 GMT
Thinking back to EV, many people submitted pictures, and asked for comments and suggestions to improve the quality of their picture processing, as we are all varying degrees of amateurs, and constructive criticism is really to our advantage, and we can learn from it. I remember a few years back in EV a lady had a beautiful creation with comments, that had a glaring spelling error, and I pm'd her, and told her, and she was most appreciative, as she was having it printed, and she missed the mistake, as well as the proof reader! Letting her know this, saved her several dollars.
|
|
|
Post by Tpgettys on May 31, 2015 1:59:15 GMT
Thinking back to EV, many people submitted pictures, and asked for comments and suggestions to improve the quality of their picture processing, as we are all varying degrees of amateurs, and constructive criticism is really to our advantage, and we can learn from it. I remember a few years back in EV a lady had a beautiful creation with comments, that had a glaring spelling error, and I pm'd her, and told her, and she was most appreciative, as she was having it printed, and she missed the mistake, as well as the proof reader! Letting her know this, saved her several dollars. I can easily imagine she was appreciative for the heads up, and appreciative that you did it using a PM, avoiding any public embarrassment.
|
|
craftysnapper
Junior Forum Member
Posts: 184
Open to constructive criticism of photos: Yes
|
Post by craftysnapper on May 31, 2015 9:57:07 GMT
Oh boy it seems my images and Bokeh have certainly generated some discussion so this is going to be a long reply. First let me say thank you to everyone who commented on them be it a critique or just to say they like it. I have no problem with anyone critiquing my images or offering a different perspective, my ego is not that fragile and I have confidence in my own work for it not to bother me and have long took the advice that I always offer others....Off a critique take the useful parts you agree with and apply them and discard the parts you disagree with, this is how you grow as a photographer. Saying that I reserve the right to say and give my reasons if I do not agree with a critique, it's a double edged sword. As to Bokek manipulating my image I would not normally have a problem with it, but as I posted it for members of this forum to see his statement This bother me and if he has posted it somewhere else where is it and has he credited me with it..perhaps he would care to clarify and point me in the direction of this posting? As to the rest regarding editing others images without permission, usually it is either in the rules or there are separate forums for them like at few of my forums where you have a show your photos section and a for critique one. I would point out that in this case you will find you usually get very few in the critique section and you have boatloads in the show your work section and you may wish to bear this in mind as to much constant and heavy critique will deter some people (not me) from posting in your show your work section and very few myself included post to the gallery section. The best way to my mind that deals with this is the one where permission is given or denied in your posting avitar box like this. As it stands at the moment with no clarity on the matter then in my opinion it is good manners to ask first. These are just my opinions and feelings on the matter others may feel differently. Now onto my replies to the critiques. Thank you Alex, I of course could reply that this is how the image was and anyone knowing the area would say it is not a true representation of the place or scene..of course as I am died in the wool pictorialist/artistic photographer then that is complete bull@&*t. And you are perfectly correct and thank you for pointing it out I shall see how it looks with them edited out. Thanks for commenting but I do get the feeling you are looking for faults by your wording It is a bird but a spec of dust is a fault a bird in the sky is not I was going to say better to have said a spec of dust or possibly a bird that after resizing looks like a dust spot but I see after someone pointed it out they saw a bird you changed your wording after. And yes it was a oversight on my part after resizing, but after saying that on my monitor at the size I posted I can see the shape of the wings so maybe I and Bala just have better monitors but yes it should be cloned out as I do not know the resolution of people monitors viewing it. I fully agree with the crop. Oh but the colour balance of your edit is to my eyes awful, you now have warm purply tone in the mist which my image had but now has a limey green tint to the sunrise colours. Which brings me to my pet view on colour temperature. Do you know that human beings are not capable of seeing true colour temperature? That is why we have machines capable of reading colour temperature like colour temp meters. Our eyes see it but our brain processes it wrong because from a early age we are taught that a certain colour looks like this, we are not taught that white at midday looks like this and white in a evening sunset looks like this and white under a cold blue winters sky looks like this. So our brain filters out this colour casts our eyes see, just like the eyedropper tool in the colour balance filter makes whites and greys a midday white or grey. We see a sunset sky with saturated red and oranges but do not see that reflected in a white shirt or green grass our perception is altered from reality we are basically flawed when it comes to seeing colour temperature which is why in those image taken in the warm light of early morning or evening I try to show the true colour temperature with it's colour caste which in my eyes is more beautiful than the distorted view filtered by our brains we actually see, so you see i am actually righting a wrong. My guess is animals see true colour temperature because no one has told them what it should look like. Another pet theory of mine is animal migration by season and temperature and if so why then when we have late winter why do they still migrate when the temp has not dropped? perhaps they see seasonal colour temperature which triggers their migration...anyway I digress and say thank you to eveyone.
|
|
Bayla
Established Forum Member
Posts: 555
|
Post by Bayla on May 31, 2015 10:42:35 GMT
Thinking back to EV, many people submitted pictures, and asked for comments and suggestions to improve the quality of their picture processing, as we are all varying degrees of amateurs, and constructive criticism is really to our advantage, and we can learn from it. I think the important word here is the one I have highlighted. Unsolicited advice is sometimes but not always appreciated! I remember a few years back in EV a lady had a beautiful creation with comments, that had a glaring spelling error, and I pm'd her, and told her, and she was most appreciative, as she was having it printed, and she missed the mistake, as well as the proof reader! Letting her know this, saved her several dollars. I think my mistake was to point out the typo in a post rather than as a PM. I did it in all sincerity to avoid someone printing out something with a mistake just like you did but it was definitely not appreciated! Bayla
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2015 10:47:10 GMT
Hi crafteysnapper, regarding colour temperature and how images look on a screen, basically no two screens will display an image the same because we have no control over how peoples' screens are configured in relation to brightness, contrast, saturation hues etc. Because I make a lot of prints from my images I calibrate my screen regularly and have made custom profiles for my printer. Therefore any given image will look differently on my screen when compared to an uncalibrated screen. I have no idea if your screen is calibrated or not. But in any case, this issue is now moot. I did not intend to upset anyone on this forum but a couple of things have happened on this forum since this morning which I am not happy about and I have pm'd tpgettys and the member concerned informing them on what I will be doing. As a consequence I have informed tpgettys that I now feel this forum is no longer a type of forum I want to be a member of, so this is my last post. Good luck and best wishes with your photography
|
|
craftysnapper
Junior Forum Member
Posts: 184
Open to constructive criticism of photos: Yes
|
Post by craftysnapper on May 31, 2015 10:54:34 GMT
Hi Bokeh, My screen is calibrated once a week with a spyder pro. Sorry you feel like that as I looked forward to seeing some of your images and good luck to you.
|
|
Madame
Established Forum Member
Posts: 504
Open to constructive criticism of photos: Yes
|
Post by Madame on May 31, 2015 14:12:59 GMT
I'm sorry that my respond to bokeh made such a discussion. I stated my (personal) opinion about editing others pictures. I also questioned his intimation about posting Paul's picture on other sites. I'm not starting a new discussion.. just clarifying my thoughts. Paul I'm sorry that I disturbed your thread. I have never experienced something like this before, I hope noone thinks that I had in mind to start "a war" of some kind. My suggestion about the matter in question, is either to tell that you want your picture to be edited, or to make a separate section to post in.
|
|
|
Post by BuckSkin on May 31, 2015 15:14:21 GMT
I'm sorry that my respond to bokeh made such a discussion. I stated my (personal) opinion about editing others pictures. I also questioned his intimation about posting Paul's picture on other sites. I'm not starting a new discussion.. just clarifying my thoughts. Paul I'm sorry that I disturbed your thread. I have never experienced something like this before, I hope noone thinks that I had in mind to start "a war" of some kind. My suggestion about the matter in question, is either to tell that you want your picture to be edited, or to make a separate section to post in. You were just brave enough to say what the rest of us were thinking and I, for one, am grateful that you did.
I personally don't believe that being a member of a forum for just a few hours gives anyone the moral right to barge in and start criticizing others.
Myself, I have little room to say anything; as, I am just thankful that others much smarter than myself took it upon themselves to make this new site available, and available free of charge; otherwise, if it were not free, I couldn't be here.
That being said, I believe that there needs to be another section added specifically for posting images seeking helpful critique, a section completely separate from this one; if memory serves, I believe there was such a separate section at EV.
From the title of this section, "SHOW YOUR WORK", I took it to be just that, a place to show others what one has done, without the trauma of strangers belittling their efforts.
Although I am very thick-skinned, it wouldn't take me long to just quit posting my work if all it got me was criticism; a horse that gets whipped every time he is bridled soon gets smart and cannot be caught.
Just my pennies worth; ....... I don't have two cents.
ON EDIT: SOMEHOW, THIS DOUBLE POSTED
I went to "edit this post", but could not find a "delete this post" button.
|
|
WayneS
Established Forum Member
Posts: 476
Open to constructive criticism of photos: Yes
|
Post by WayneS on May 31, 2015 15:42:07 GMT
Oh boy it seems my images and Bokeh have certainly generated some discussion so this is going to be a long reply. First let me say thank you to everyone who commented on them be it a critique or just to say they like it. I have no problem with anyone critiquing my images or offering a different perspective, my ego is not that fragile and I have confidence in my own work for it not to bother me and have long took the advice that I always offer others....Off a critique take the useful parts you agree with and apply them and discard the parts you disagree with, this is how you grow as a photographer. Saying that I reserve the right to say and give my reasons if I do not agree with a critique, it's a double edged sword. As to Bokek manipulating my image I would not normally have a problem with it, but as I posted it for members of this forum to see his statement This bother me and if he has posted it somewhere else where is it and has he credited me with it..perhaps he would care to clarify and point me in the direction of this posting? As to the rest regarding editing others images without permission, usually it is either in the rules or there are separate forums for them like at few of my forums where you have a show your photos section and a for critique one. I would point out that in this case you will find you usually get very few in the critique section and you have boatloads in the show your work section and you may wish to bear this in mind as to much constant and heavy critique will deter some people (not me) from posting in your show your work section and very few myself included post to the gallery section. The best way to my mind that deals with this is the one where permission is given or denied in your posting avitar box like this. As it stands at the moment with no clarity on the matter then in my opinion it is good manners to ask first. These are just my opinions and feelings on the matter others may feel differently. Now onto my replies to the critiques. Thank you Alex, I of course could reply that this is how the image was and anyone knowing the area would say it is not a true representation of the place or scene..of course as I am died in the wool pictorialist/artistic photographer then that is complete bull@&*t. And you are perfectly correct and thank you for pointing it out I shall see how it looks with them edited out. Thanks for commenting but I do get the feeling you are looking for faults by your wording It is a bird but a spec of dust is a fault a bird in the sky is not I was going to say better to have said a spec of dust or possibly a bird that after resizing looks like a dust spot but I see after someone pointed it out they saw a bird you changed your wording after. And yes it was a oversight on my part after resizing, but after saying that on my monitor at the size I posted I can see the shape of the wings so maybe I and Bala just have better monitors but yes it should be cloned out as I do not know the resolution of people monitors viewing it. I fully agree with the crop. Oh but the colour balance of your edit is to my eyes awful, you now have warm purply tone in the mist which my image had but now has a limey green tint to the sunrise colours. Which brings me to my pet view on colour temperature. Do you know that human beings are not capable of seeing true colour temperature? That is why we have machines capable of reading colour temperature like colour temp meters. Our eyes see it but our brain processes it wrong because from a early age we are taught that a certain colour looks like this, we are not taught that white at midday looks like this and white in a evening sunset looks like this and white under a cold blue winters sky looks like this. So our brain filters out this colour casts our eyes see, just like the eyedropper tool in the colour balance filter makes whites and greys a midday white or grey. We see a sunset sky with saturated red and oranges but do not see that reflected in a white shirt or green grass our perception is altered from reality we are basically flawed when it comes to seeing colour temperature which is why in those image taken in the warm light of early morning or evening I try to show the true colour temperature with it's colour caste which in my eyes is more beautiful than the distorted view filtered by our brains we actually see, so you see i am actually righting a wrong. My guess is animals see true colour temperature because no one has told them what it should look like. Another pet theory of mine is animal migration by season and temperature and if so why then when we have late winter why do they still migrate when the temp has not dropped? perhaps they see seasonal colour temperature which triggers their migration...anyway I digress and say thank you to eveyone. Well said Crafteysnapper!! But did you know you spelled the very last word wrong Sorry, to quote the old Flip Wilson show "The devil made me do it"!!
|
|
Bayla
Established Forum Member
Posts: 555
|
Post by Bayla on May 31, 2015 15:56:57 GMT
Well said Crafteysnapper!! But did you know you spelled the very last word wrong Sorry, to quote the old Flip Wilson show "The devil made me do it"!! And Wayne, I just can't resist pointing out that you put an extra 'e' in Craftysnapper's name!!!! But to get back on topic, I have really enjoyed seeing these pictures of dear old Birmingham. I spent many an hour studying for my degree in the old Library. Bayla
|
|
|
Post by BuckSkin on May 31, 2015 16:36:36 GMT
Well said Crafteysnapper!! But did you know you spelled the very last word wrong Sorry, to quote the old Flip Wilson show "The devil made me do it"!! And Wayne, I just can't resist pointing out that you put an extra 'e' in Craftysnapper's name!!!! But to get back on topic, I have really enjoyed seeing these pictures of dear old Birmingham. I spent many an hour studying for my degree in the old Library. Bayla Maybe I am mixed up, but I thought we were looking at pictures of a foggy lake with a fence and big birds.
I enjoyed the library pictures as well.
|
|
Bayla
Established Forum Member
Posts: 555
|
Post by Bayla on May 31, 2015 16:49:46 GMT
You're right. That is one hell of a senior moment! I remember thinking I wanted to reply the library thread & somehow mixed up the two!
And I particularly like the first of Craftysnapper's two pictures, little bird/dust mote and all! I'd put a picture like that on my wall
Bayla
|
|
|
Post by Sepiana on May 31, 2015 17:29:45 GMT
ON EDIT: SOMEHOW, THIS DOUBLE POSTED I went to "edit this post", but could not find a "delete this post" button. BuckSkin,
I went ahead and deleted your duplicate post. If you click on the Gear button to the right of the Edit button, you will find the Delete Post option.
|
|